To hold or not to hold
Set 1: 55mm
Photos: 1/125
Photos: 1/15
Photos: 1/2
Set 2: 35mm
Photos: 1/125
Photos: 1/15
Photos: 1/2
How deep
Set one: 55mm
F 5.6
Set 2: 35mm
F8
F11
Equivalent exposure
F8 - 16 - P
F/8 - 1/6 - M
F22 - 1/40 - M
F/22 - 0"8 - ISO 320 - M
F4.5 - 1/25 - P
F4.5 - 1/25 - M
F11 - 1/4 - M
F11 - 1/4 - ISO 125 - M
F4.5 - 1/40 - P
F4.5 - 1/40 - M
F16 - 1/4 - M
F16 - 1/5 - ISO 320 - M
I know better
Photo 1: F6.3 - 1/50 - ISO 200
Photo 2: F5.6 - 1/60 - ISO 400
Photo 3: F4.0 - 1/25 - ISO 200
Photo 4: F5.6 - 1/40 - ISO 200
Photo 5: F10 - 1/50 - ISO 200
Photo 6: F4.5 - 1/1000 - ISO 500
Photo 7: F25 - 6" - ISO 100
Photo 8: F25 - 6" - ISO 100
Photo 9: F25 - 6" - ISO 300
Based on the fly on the wall interpretation from my peers, they all believe that I captured the importance of the assignment. From what I heard based on the first set of photos, there was questions regarding how I got certain images when they display the focal length they are. To explain, the camera setting was set at each focal length they are labeled as, yet I am the one who moved to the objects to simulate the close aspects shown. Even with how close I was those images would all look different if taken at the same position using different focal lengths. As for the second set for depth of field, they all claim I did a great job in capturing depth, with the exception of my settings used at F11. The change was not as drastic as the first two sets, and that may because of the mode or how they display on the computer after uploading from the camera. The Third area regarding equivalent exposures from what I have heard I got the idea as I hit the second set of photos continued through. The last set of images for the I know better set, there was one image that had my phone on the table by accident. I need to check my surfaces and make sure everything is where it needs to be. They also explained that I had a very good use of shadows and space. The last image sparked a lot of questions in how it was done.
ReplyDelete